<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TobaccoToday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tobaccotoday.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info</link>
	<description>Information on the Tobacco industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Tobacco Plus Expo 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/03/02/tobacco-plus-expo-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/03/02/tobacco-plus-expo-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lou Maiellano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exhibitions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Show that means business for all those in the tobacco business. It&#8217;s @ the Las Vegas Convention Center, March 3rd &#38; 4th 2010. Who&#8217;s going? Report back! Tell us what was good? What was new? What you learn? Have a great time! &#8211; See you at the show!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Show that means business for all those in the tobacco business. It&#8217;s @ the Las Vegas Convention Center, March 3rd &amp; 4th 2010. Who&#8217;s going? Report back! Tell us what was good? What was new? What you learn? Have a great time! &#8211; See you at the show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/03/02/tobacco-plus-expo-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LIP competition heats up!</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/15/lip-competition-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/15/lip-competition-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crawley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fire Safe Compliant cigarettes / Low Ignition Propensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key International Business & Market Developments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. announced that it filed a patent infringement lawsuit recently in the United States District Court against Astra Tobacco Corporation, Delfort Group and German groups Julius Glatz, GmbH, and LIPtec, GmbH, over alleged infringement of their US patent number 6,725,867 for low ignition propensity cigarette paper.
Astra Tobacco is the sales and marketing company for Delfort group in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 19pt">Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. announced that it filed a patent infringement lawsuit recently in the United States District Court against Astra Tobacco Corporation, Delfort Group and German groups Julius Glatz, GmbH, and LIPtec, GmbH, over alleged infringement of their US patent number 6,725,867 for low ignition propensity cigarette paper.</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 19pt">Astra Tobacco is the sales and marketing company for Delfort group in the US.</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 19pt">Glatz GmbH has also recently launched a LIP paper after considerable speculation they were developing a LIP paper.</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 19pt">SWM apparently intends to defend its LIP intellectual property in the courts if necessary. It will be interesting to see if their patents are robust enough to withstand close scrutiny.</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 19pt">comments welcome&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/15/lip-competition-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imperial UK sells Sodim to Hauni</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/09/imperial-uk-sells-sodim-to-hauni/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/09/imperial-uk-sells-sodim-to-hauni/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crawley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hauni Maschinenbau AG acquired Sodim SAS from Imperial Tobacco Group Plc on February 2 2010.
The  sale by Imperial is no great surprise as Sodim clearly did not represent core business activities and was probably slated for sale soon after Imperial acquired Altadis.
In a press release Sodim reiterated its personnel, biz relationships, and location remain unaffected. 
Perhaps of greater interest are the potential [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hauni Maschinenbau AG acquired Sodim SAS from Imperial Tobacco Group Plc on February 2 2010.</p>
<p>The  sale by Imperial is no great surprise as Sodim clearly did not represent core business activities and was probably slated for sale soon after Imperial acquired Altadis.</p>
<p>In a press release Sodim reiterated its personnel, biz relationships, and location remain unaffected. </p>
<p>Perhaps of greater interest are the potential repercussions of this acquisition.</p>
<p>Premises are  likely to be consolidated in the longer term &#8211; perhaps merging with Hauni&#8217;s affiliate Decoulfe.</p>
<p>Sodim has enjoyed a recent virtual monopoly within Imperial and this may change.</p>
<p>Huni on the other hand has previously worked with market leader Cerulean in developing on-line measurement systems to complement machinery.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your view?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This new relationship provides Hauni with an important additional portfolio of products in the areas of metrology and measurement systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/09/imperial-uk-sells-sodim-to-hauni/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Smokefree Future &#8211; England&#8217;s Ten Year Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/02/a-smokefree-future-englands-ten-year-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/02/a-smokefree-future-englands-ten-year-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lou Maiellano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key International Business & Market Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snus, Snuff & Alternative Products in US Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco Harm Reduction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an historic first for public health, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of the UK&#8217;s National Health Service overwhelming approved tobacco harm reduction as a key component in England&#8217;s ten year plan to reduce cigarette smoking by half.  The US FDA should follow the UK&#8217;s lead.  The announcement and a news excerpt are below, the press release is attached, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an historic first for public health, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) of the UK&#8217;s National Health Service overwhelming approved tobacco harm reduction as a key component in England&#8217;s ten year plan to reduce cigarette smoking by half.  The US FDA should follow the UK&#8217;s lead.  The announcement and a news excerpt are below, the press release is attached, and the full report &#8220;A Smokefree Future&#8221; is at <a href="http://www.dh.gov.uk/dr_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_111748.pdf">http://www.dh.gov.uk/dr_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_111748.pdf</a></p>
<p>Interesting development in the UK.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts?</p>
<p>Do you see the FDA following suit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/02/02/a-smokefree-future-englands-ten-year-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The FDA Registration process</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/01/30/the-fda-registration-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/01/30/the-fda-registration-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 19:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crawley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulations: FDA etc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had the privilege of starting the FDA registration process recently for a tobacco client and thought it worth sharing my experiences.
All the information on what needs to be done including a check list is available on the FDA website. This is helpful; at least there&#8217;s a template to work from.
What&#8217;s missing is exactly how to do it. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the privilege of starting the FDA registration process recently for a tobacco client and thought it worth sharing my experiences.</p>
<p>All the information on what needs to be done including a check list is available on the FDA website. This is helpful; at least there&#8217;s a template to work from.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s missing is exactly how to do it. There&#8217;s a lot of detail and you must pay particular attention to the sequence.</p>
<p>The tricky part is obtaining the personal digital certificate. If you don&#8217;t have (much / any) experience with digital certificates and signatures this part will turn you for a loop. Nothing (with FDA) can be done without it!</p>
<p>On the FDA website there is a list of digital signature providers and links to their websites. One is free &#8211; all the others want money and in some cases quite a bit.</p>
<p>Assuming the correspondence for letters of non-repudiation has also been sent &#8211; and is correct, you wil receive a reply from FDA. You can then start setting up your (WebTrader) test account. Essentially you are verifying the communication link &#8211; to FDA &#8211; and exchanging parts of the digital certificates with FDA which allows your data to be identified as uniquely yours and FDA to receive encrypted secure data.</p>
<p>So far so good.</p>
<p>After this you receive further notifications from FDA and then make a second test submission. If this all goes well&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.you can set up a Production Account.</p>
<p>Remember up until now no data has been exchanged. More on this later.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t started the process I encourage you to get going &#8211; the registration deadline is February 28 and there are other deadlines looming in April and June.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/01/30/the-fda-registration-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liggett Group protests  to FDA</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/01/04/liggett-group-protests-to-fda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/01/04/liggett-group-protests-to-fda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crawley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations: FDA etc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liggett group&#8217;s general counsel sent a letter to FDA protesting the nomination process representing small tobacco businesses.
FDA has previously made clear that only small manufacturers could vote / nominate a representative to their category. Liggett contends this was not intended in the legislation and they should have some say under a broader definition of a small [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liggett group&#8217;s general counsel sent a letter to FDA protesting the nomination process representing small tobacco businesses.</p>
<p>FDA has previously made clear that only small manufacturers could vote / nominate a representative to their category. Liggett contends this was not intended in the legislation and they should have some say under a broader definition of a small manufacturer.</p>
<p>Any view and opinions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2010/01/04/liggett-group-protests-to-fda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Professor: E-Cigarette Safer than Regular cigarettes, FDA Study is Propoganda</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/30/professor-e-cigarette-safer-than-regular-cigarettes-fda-study-is-propoganda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/30/professor-e-cigarette-safer-than-regular-cigarettes-fda-study-is-propoganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Dunworth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations: FDA etc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snus, Snuff & Alternative Products in US Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tobacco Harm Reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent interview with ECigaretteDirect.co.uk Carl Phillips, Associate Professor at the University of Alberta in Canada, told us that the electronic cigarette was an order of magnitude safer than regular cigarettes and that an FDA study into the electronic cigarette was &#8220;pure propoganda&#8221;.
The electronic cigarette carried, he estimated, around one percent of the risk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent interview with ECigaretteDirect.co.uk Carl Phillips, Associate Professor at the University of Alberta in Canada, told us that the electronic cigarette was an order of magnitude safer than regular cigarettes and that an FDA study into the electronic cigarette was &#8220;pure propoganda&#8221;.</p>
<p>The electronic cigarette carried, he estimated, around one percent of the risk of regular cigarettes.</p>
<p>While he acknowledged that the electronic cigarette carried traces of carcinogens, he pointed out that banning the electronic cigarette based on the very low levels of carcinogens contained within would also mean &#8220;banning half the foods available.&#8221;</p>
<p>Given that, he argued, the FDA&#8217;s stance on the electronic cigarette was motivated by propoganda and not by science.</p>
<p>You can read the full interview here: <a href="http://www.ecigarettedirect.co.uk/carl">Electronic Cigarette Interview with Carl Phillips</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/30/professor-e-cigarette-safer-than-regular-cigarettes-fda-study-is-propoganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FSC</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/30/fsc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/30/fsc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fairhairedone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you call the Marlboro # you get someone reading what the FSC is. Nothing more, nothing less.  I am definitely going to look into rolling  my own cigarettes. You guys are right.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you call the Marlboro # you get someone reading what the FSC is. Nothing more, nothing less.  I am definitely going to look into rolling  my own cigarettes. You guys are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/30/fsc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To all our readers and visitors</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/21/to-all-our-readers-and-visitors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/21/to-all-our-readers-and-visitors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 15:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crawley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations: FDA etc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well if your year was anything like mine &#8211; 2009 raced by and it&#8217;s now Christmas again and the East coast is blanketed in snow!
We hope you had a good 2009 but wish you a better 2010. Have a great Christmas too and thanks for all your contributions, comments and visits. These are all appreciated.
For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if your year was anything like mine &#8211; 2009 raced by and it&#8217;s now Christmas again and the East coast is blanketed in snow!</p>
<p>We hope you had a good 2009 but wish you a better 2010. Have a great Christmas too and thanks for all your contributions, comments and visits. These are all appreciated.</p>
<p>For the Tobacco Industry a lot happened in 2009. We are still living with the changed lanscape but be sure it&#8217;s different now.</p>
<p>In the US tax increases (Federal and many States) were instrumental in making our business smaller / faster. Ironically the State tax increases were mostly driven by a desperate need to plug budget short falls. High taxes in Canada continued to encourage the development of a thriving contraband business from native reservations adjacent to the Provinces of Ontario and Quebec.</p>
<p>Much the same applies to the cigarette business in Paraguay into Brazil.</p>
<p>After years of speculation this administration passed FDA regulation of Tobacco. This fundamentally changes the US tobacco landscape permanently and irrevocably.</p>
<p>Our industy is smaller but continues to adjust to meet business challenges.</p>
<p>Finally we should not forget our customers. Thank-you.</p>
<p>Consider this: As smokers &#8211; there are around 60 million of you in the US &#8211; enough to make a loud noise if you choose to about smoking restrictions and many other issues affecting the daily lives of smokers.</p>
<p>We offer this forum to voice your concerns.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/21/to-all-our-readers-and-visitors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It may be Fire Safe Compliant &#8211; but does it taste good?</title>
		<link>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/15/it-may-be-fire-safe-compliant-but-does-it-taste-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/15/it-may-be-fire-safe-compliant-but-does-it-taste-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Crawley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire Safe Compliant cigarettes / Low Ignition Propensity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations: FDA etc.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tobaccotoday.info/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an attempt to prevent fires from unattended lit cigarettes various governments are requiring FSC cigarettes. 49 of the 50 US States require it or have already passed legislation that will. Lone stand-out is Wyoming (population 10)  but this is only a matter of time. Canada required it several years go, Australia and South Africa will soon and the EU.
Look through this blog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an attempt to prevent fires from unattended lit cigarettes various governments are requiring FSC cigarettes. 49 of the 50 US States require it or have already passed legislation that will. Lone stand-out is Wyoming (population 10)  but this is only a matter of time. Canada required it several years go, Australia and South Africa will soon and the EU.</p>
<p>Look through this blog and you will see many complaints about the taste of FSC cigarettes. It would be interesting to know what Brands?</p>
<p>Many consumers dislike the taste and believe something noxious has been added to deter smokers- not true.</p>
<p>What has changed is the burn characteristics of the cigarette and when you do this the taste changes.</p>
<p>As FSC regulations come on board many Manufacturers are 100% migrating to FSC product to avoid shipping the wrong product into a FSC State and avoid the heavy fines associated with this error.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s your experience? Tell us what Brands you&#8217;re smoking and if they taste good or bad??</p>
<p>Feedback welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tobaccotoday.info/2009/12/15/it-may-be-fire-safe-compliant-but-does-it-taste-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
