Comments on: CBS 60 Minutes: Going Smokeless

By: TAZ

TAZ — Wed, 09 Jun 2010 19:12:09 +0000

Found this of interest – FDA sites failed quality standards, 30 deaths, and over 700 injuries. Were talking about children.

http://web.matildelinenbergersystems.net/alq8pwifiwlbbbby5uapqkga1?CID=30512&AFID=59937&DID=130176&SID=EZBTylenol20100606ch3CTXRT8892A

By: Iowa Farm Boy

Iowa Farm Boy — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:24:04 +0000

You would think the Government would have something better to do then go after smokeless tobacco. Maby increasing jobs, or the bettering the business climate, reducing taxes, rather than make things harder for the little business man.
No, they want to to do the mundane stuff that the liberals like that gets their name in the paper.

By: Jersey Boy

Jersey Boy — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:25:00 +0000

Oh by the way Snus is taxable!

By: Jersey Boy

Jersey Boy — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 03:24:35 +0000

Its just always so interesting how the anti folks live on such misrepresentation of the facts. I just wish the truth would be realized. Snus is awesome!

By: Copenhagen Charlie

Copenhagen Charlie — Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:33:29 +0000

I just really thing this ridiculous that a few uneducated wanna stick their face in everyone else’s business just get away with this crap. Amazes me I think this country needs a revolution!

By: ACitizen2

ACitizen2 — Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:43:45 +0000

I love how these “anti-tobacco” zealots are dead set against replacing nicotine with smokeless snus, (or e-cigs) when these same folks have been advocating the “benefits” of Nicotine Replacement “Therapy” for years!

So what is the difference?

Most likely, that the “health police” hypocrites like the chubby “anti” above, who likely draws some of her paycheck from the pharma makers of UNTAXED patches and gums, might be losing profits to “evil” big tobacco; and the villainous providers of a more natural, cheaper, (and likely more satisfying?) product, which is taxed for the “public good” – might crowd out those that butter her cake.

Go figure.